Soft sculptures by Daisy Collingridge |
I was also struck by how many of the artist statements referenced a
conscious exploration of the relationship between femininity and textile
crafts. In a post-Pussyhat era this should probably not be particularly
surprising, though given the audience to which textile show like this cater in
the UK (i.e. white middle-class and middle-age women with an increasing number
of younger women who have discovered a passion for the hand-made), it was still
unusual to see this topic explored in so many of the galleries without it being
a central theme of the show. Unfortunately, my initial excitement about this
was soon flattened and I more than once cringed at some of the sweeping
generalisations that, in my opinion, very much reframed needlework and
femininity within the restrictive binary categories that the pieces supposedly
thought to redefine. In fact, more than once, they appeared to reinscribe the
idea of 'women's work' as something that exists outside the realm of public
politics.
Take, for example, this sentence found in one of the galleries:
"Before women had a political voice, they used domestic arts as a covert
form of protest and activism". Firstly, the sentence literally implies
that there was a time when women had no political voice whatsoever. As such, it
basically questions the political validity and efficacy of the 'covert form[s]
of protest and activism" it refers to. Not only does the statement create
a hierarchy between good and bad activism, but also around definitions of 'the
political'. Subsequently, the abstract then goes on to equate suffrage with
'political voice', thus, grounding the political and political voice firmly
within the realm of state-sanctioned acts of citizenship like voting. And low
and behold, with a general election around the corner in the UK, I am by no
means saying that voting isn’t important.
An Ideal Woman? Who blazed your trail? by Jen Cable |
However, I do think that we need to move away
from conceptualisations of the political and political voice solely within the
context of normative citizenship and 'measurable' or quantifiable perceptions
of practical politics that often focus on policies, government spending and
voter turnout. These concepts themselves are deeply tied to patriarchal and
colonial systems of knowledge and governance that have always attempted to
relegate 'women's work' as inferior. If this then is the framework against
which we examine "domestic arts as a covert form of protest and
activism," I am afraid that it will always be found lacking. My
suggestion? Let's try and avoid this binary way of thinking and focus instead
on the kind of political acts practices of needlework make possible. How can
they provide a means to rethink our understanding of concepts like the
political, political voice, and citizenship?
Touching Corner by Luisa Desanti |